← Search

Joan van Rees

Saint Louis, MO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 61W–40L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Joan van Rees to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2025-05-04 · Sneed/Schober (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Smout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-04-13 · Sneed/Schober (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennie Oberkrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-03-23 · Sneed/Schober (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Sneed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-09 · Sneed/Schober (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Polansky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-02-16 · Sneed/Schober (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin LeClerc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-02-02 · Sneed/Schober (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ganschaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-01-19 · Sneed/Schober (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ganschaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-01-12 · Schober/Sneed (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-12-08 · Schober/Sneed (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-4
W
2024-11-24 · Schober/Sneed (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Bastow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-10 · Schober/Sneed (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Ganschaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-10-20 · Schober/Sneed (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Sneed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
62.5%
60W–36L · 54.2% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#1 Singles
13%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal