← Search

Amanda Wildman

Columbus, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 125W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amanda Wildman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
W
2026-05-04 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blythe Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-2
L
2026-04-13 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kaoru Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-16 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Becky Savage
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Kelly Schlessman
2026-03-15 · The Players Club · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Christy Birkholz / Emily Smith
2026-03-09 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thai Pham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-5
L
2026-02-02 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandy Richards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
Grace Ukairo / Cindy Smith
2026-01-18 · The Players Club · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyson Tanenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-08 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Budd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-12-01 · Olympic · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Budd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2025-11-17 · Olympic · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Budd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-16 · The Players Club · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Beamer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-10-13 · Olympic · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suki Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
75%
21W–7L · 61.2% of games
4.0
48.8%
62W–65L · 49.9% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
68.4%
39W–18L · 55.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 23% of the time
#3 Doubles
23%
49 matches
#1 Singles
21%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
39 matches
#2 Singles
17%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova