← Search

Lorra Baker

Pasadena, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 102W–161L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lorra Baker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history263 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Poole-Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Poole-Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-25 · Herishen/Wishard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Trull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · Herishen/Wishard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Poole-Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · de Kleine - Making a Racquet · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Slomine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · Twele - Making A Racquet · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hubbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · de Kleine - Making a Racquet · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Slomine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-25 · Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · de Kleine - Making a Racquet · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Slomine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-19 · Twele - Making A Racquet · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Bruce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
48.1%
51W–55L · 51.2% of games
3.5
27.8%
15W–39L · 43% of games
5.5
0%
0W–5L · 31.6% of games
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.7% of games
6.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.6% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
45.5%
20W–24L · 48.9% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
13.3%
2W–13L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
102 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
46 matches
#1 Singles
13%
35 matches
#2 Singles
7%
19 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer