← Search

Andrea Perotti

CHESTER, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 34W–23L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Andrea Perotti to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Ravekes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · Hill · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Mehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Ravekes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Mehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Dare Doubles · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Mehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Ravekes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Mehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Hill · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Yannone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-05 · Dare Doubles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Mehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · Hill · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Mehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · Hill · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tammi Molavi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-22 · Dare Doubles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Steel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-3
W
2026-05-21 · Dare Doubles · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Mehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha van Cleve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 55% of games
7.0
57.9%
22W–16L · 52.1% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal