← Search

Kelly Trimyer

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 98W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kelly Trimyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
W
N/A
2026-08-01 · NMAC.Hill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Lockhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · ACP.Nash · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
Linda Blevins / Anna Jones
2026-07-15 · NMAC.Hill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Lockhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · NMAC.Hill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Lockhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · MD.Pavlick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · MD.Pavlick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Kell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-25 · MD.Pavlick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Reinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · NMAC.Hill · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Lockhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · NMAC.Moreno · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Devon Siege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · NMAC.Moreno · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · NMAC.Moreno · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adrienne Todd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-26 · NMAC.Moreno · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrice Dovel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
81.1%
30W–7L · 63.3% of games
4.0
49.2%
30W–31L · 49.8% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 68.7% of games
7.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert