← Search

Rachel Kacmar

— year-end
97 matches · 83W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Kacmar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-07-14 · RHCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Briana Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Tsuo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Tsuo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · RHCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen McClary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Tsuo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Briana Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-28 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-14 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darden Coors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-08-17 · #2 Doubles · with Brenda Christy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
Sutton Spanton / Erin Rhodes
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Melissa Pugh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Brenda Christy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 72.1% of games
3.0
88.2%
30W–4L · 68% of games
3.5
80%
28W–7L · 62.7% of games
4.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 57.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer