← Search

Briana Jackson

Lakewood, CO
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 66W–26L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Briana Jackson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-07-14 · RHCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Kacmar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · RHCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Joens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-07 · RHCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-23 · RHCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen McClary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Strobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · RHCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Joens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · RHCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-05-28 · RHCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Kacmar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · RHCC TEAL · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Strobel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-04-28 · RHCC TEAL · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
5W–5L · 54.4% of games
3.0
70.7%
29W–12L · 61.1% of games
3.5
90%
18W–2L · 67.9% of games
4.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 60.2% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
9 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer