← Search

Brooke Rawls

Apex, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
318 matches · 197W–121L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brooke Rawls to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history318 matches
W
2026-09-11 · MD.McDarris · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dori Mcdarris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · MD.McDarris · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dori Mcdarris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-12 · MD.Winzenz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Reinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · MD.Winzenz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Messick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-09 · MD.Ligay · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-27 · MD.Rawls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cait Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-20 · MD.Rawls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-14 · MD.Grogan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · MD.Rawls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-13 · MD.Rawls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Guccia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-07 · MD.Grogan · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Yarber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-01 · MD.Ligay · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Moses
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 87% of games
2.5
85.2%
23W–4L · 71% of games
3.0
60%
36W–24L · 55.8% of games
3.5
52.4%
33W–30L · 50.7% of games
4.0
10%
1W–9L · 36.3% of games
5.0
100%
5W–0L · 69.7% of games
5.5
69%
29W–13L · 58.7% of games
6.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 57.1% of games
7.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 52.8% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
115 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
106 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
71 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
9 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe