← Search

Rochelle Grieco

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
427 matches · 230W–197L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rochelle Grieco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history427 matches
W
2026-09-11 · LOCH.Kasberg · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Breah Woolson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-11 · CBaddour.18C-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carey Baddour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
Mary Hannah Vaughan / Laura Thompson
2026-09-09 · LOCH.Kasberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adrianne Leinbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-04 · Ke.Townsend40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Shelby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · Al.DeMacy18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-29 · Al.DeMacy18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-28 · LOCH.Kasberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Endres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-26 · LOCH.Kasberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Liz Kasberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-21 · Ke.Townsend40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yuwie Hager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · CBaddour.18C-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Keri A Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · Sa.Rhoades40M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-17 · Yu.Hager18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dianna Erwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
74.1%
43W–15L · 60.4% of games
4.0
44%
48W–61L · 49% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 30.3% of games
7.5
60.2%
50W–33L · 53.3% of games
8.5
51.2%
22W–21L · 48.3% of games
4.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 35.2% of games
4.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
73.5%
25W–9L · 59.3% of games
9.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
139 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
125 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
105 matches
#1 Singles
7%
31 matches
#2 Singles
4%
18 matches
#3 Singles
1%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert