← Search

Tricia Pickett

— year-end
84 matches · 46W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Tricia Pickett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Conrad/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Betsy Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Betsy Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · Miller/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sol Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-16 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Claire Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
Sheila Carro / Stephanie White
2026-07-20 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Goodnight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-09 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-24 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Kitabchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Kitabchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-10 · Conrad/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams58 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
59.3%
35W–24L · 56% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.7% of games
7.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer