← Search

Jessica Flesch

Oakland, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 65W–55L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jessica Flesch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-08-09 · Echols/ Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taylor Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-23 · Echols/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonia Castany
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Flesch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-21 · Flesch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Kirk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · Flesch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryellen Tabor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Echols/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trisha Dooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veronica Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-02 · Echols/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grace Bann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
Sheila Carro / Stephanie White
2026-06-25 · Flesch/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Pacheco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
Lisa Evans / Brandi Tomlinson
2026-06-23 · Flesch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 64.9% of games
3.5
60.4%
32W–21L · 54.7% of games
4.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 41.1% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
7W–0L · 74.8% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.7% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.3% of games
3.5mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#1 Singles
17%
20 matches
#2 Singles
10%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert