← Search

Suzanne Braga

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 36W–56L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Braga to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Pa.Alford18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yuko Resseguie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Rachel Pisciotta / Rebecca Anderson
2026-08-17 · Pa.Alford18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holly Atkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · Jo.Hastings18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amir Lyall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-04 · Jo.Hastings18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Slocum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Su.Braga18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Chris Smith / Emily Best
2026-07-24 · Jo.Hastings18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · Jo.Hastings18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-18 · Su.Braga18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Slocum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-14 · Jo.Hastings18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Slocum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · Su.Braga18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Slocum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · Jo.Hastings18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Josh Hastings mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-19 · Ki.Lamb40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Eaves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
41.5%
17W–24L · 48.5% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.4% of games
6.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.9% of games
3.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.2% of games
3.5mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 32.9% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
23 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams