← Search

Claire Limon

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 88W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Claire Limon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Ki.Patrey18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-22 · Ki.Patrey18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
April Bazin / Amanda Campbell
2026-08-12 · #1 Doubles · with Kathryn Kiel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-10 · Pa.Spell18C6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dane Brackett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · Pa.Spell18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pamela Spell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · As.Walton18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Limon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-22 · As.Walton18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Limon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · As.Walton18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Limon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · Ma.Slaymaker18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kazmierczak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · Ma.Slaymaker18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mariana Lima Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Ma.Slaymaker18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Percy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-01 · Ma.Slaymaker18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Kazmierczak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.9% of games
3.0
78.6%
22W–6L · 70.9% of games
3.5
92%
23W–2L · 69% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
100%
8W–0L · 71.3% of games
6.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 69.8% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 74.2% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
41 matches
#1 Singles
18%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#2 Singles
12%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer