← Search

Emily Best

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 44W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emily Best to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Ca.Grimes18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leigh Stallings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-17 · Ca.Grimes18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donnarie Hales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-24 · Be.Perkins18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · Ra.Brown18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · Ra.Brown18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · Ra.Brown18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Enberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Ra.Brown18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Gaskins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · Ra.Brown18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-2
W
N/A
2026-06-08 · Ra.Brown18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-19 · Ca.Grimes40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charlotte Kopp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-12 · Ca.Grimes40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-18 · Ca.Grimes18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 69.3% of games
3.0
72.2%
26W–10L · 60.2% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.3% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.2% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.1% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer