← Search

Sally Highsmith

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 161W–53L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Sally Highsmith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history214 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Sa.Highsmith40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · Ha.Cain18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sydney Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · Sa.Highsmith18M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Warren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-11 · Ju.Kerr18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · TOC.Schuch · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Traci Kornegay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-05 · Sa.Highsmith40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristen Patch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · Sa.Highsmith18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · Sa.Highsmith18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Sibley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · Sa.Highsmith18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Cain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Cl.Capps18T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with McKenzie Keenan Osman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-16 · Cl.Capps18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ferebee Plyler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
87.5%
63W–9L · 69.6% of games
3.0
78%
32W–9L · 66.2% of games
3.5
72.4%
21W–8L · 60.5% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 60.4% of games
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 59.3% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55% of games
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
38 matches
#1 Singles
17%
37 matches
#2 Singles
11%
23 matches
#3 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer