← Search

Pippa Englert

— year-end
45 matches · 17W–28L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Pippa Englert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
Lori Small / Amber Kelley-Scott
2026-05-01 · KUpton-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Burch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-28 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Roofe Lavin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-15 · LWollman-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Wollman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-10 · KUpton-CHCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tricia Holtz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-18 · LWollman-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Oakley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Stacey Smith / Kensy Ryan
2026-03-17 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Burch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-06 · KUpton-CHCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kate Upton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-04 · LWollman-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Oakley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-02-18 · LWollman-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Fitch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Stacey Smith / Sterling Ingui
2026-02-17 · CWilliamson-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Callie Barbaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-04-23 · LWollman-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karol Wenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-16 · LWollman-CHCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Lange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.1% of games
3.0
14.3%
3W–18L · 35.5% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer