← Search

Allan Orchard

NEW PROVIDENCE, NJ
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 92W–38L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Allan Orchard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2025-05-17 · #3 Doubles · with Cecilia Orchard championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brigette Elaina Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-5, 0-1
L
2025-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brigette Elaina Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-16 · NJ: Team Khoo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecilia Orchard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-23 · NJ: Team Khoo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Samantha Mulcahy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-02-02 · NJ: Team Khoo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Samantha Mulcahy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-01-26 · NJ: Team Khoo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecilia Orchard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
Eric Goldberg / Martin Malik
2025-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Don Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-3, 1-0
W
2025-01-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lars Bohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecilia Orchard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-11-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Don Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-07-24 · Kaplan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jon Rubinstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
100%
6W–0L · 68.9% of games
4.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 51.5% of games
8.0mixed
82.4%
42W–9L · 62.9% of games
9.0mixed
63.6%
21W–12L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
18 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer