← Search

Alan Kirk

Collierville, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 38W–33L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Alan Kirk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Tatum/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Huggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-25 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Schneiderman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-18 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Flesch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Peterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · Schneiderman/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Palacio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · Jussely/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean-Francois Lejeune
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Heard / Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Stark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-07 · Garner/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael McKenna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-29 · Garner/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-23 · Garner/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Alford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · Garner/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Sumrall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 62.8% of games
3.5
29.2%
7W–17L · 40.8% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 33.3% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 61.1% of games
3.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
25 matches
#1 Singles
24%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert