← Search

Kelsey Cramer

— year-end
101 matches · 48W–53L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kelsey Cramer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-07-19 · QRRC-Sommerfeldt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jana Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · KTC-Stevens · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Haack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · QRRC-Buerschen · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Namchi Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · KTC-Stevens · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Haack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · QRRC-Sommerfeldt · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Claire Nikolai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · KTC-Stevens · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Jain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · QRRC-Denker · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Sommerfeldt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · QRRC-Denker · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Taphorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · QRRC-Denker · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Taphorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-03-27 · QRRC-McNea-Wiley · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-21 · QRRC-Denker · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Taphorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-15 · QRRC-Denker · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Taphorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 59.4% of games
4.5
41.7%
10W–14L · 46.2% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
26.1%
6W–17L · 44.3% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe