← Search

Leslie Shipp

— year-end
98 matches · 69W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Leslie Shipp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2025-09-13 · Shipp & Pham: Life Time · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Hilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-04-27 · IA/Despotovich-Shipp/40&Over8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ravindran Perumal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-04-06 · IA/Rovner/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-03-29 · Shipp & Pham: Lifetime · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Hilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-03-09 · IA/Despotovich-Shipp/40&Over8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ravindran Perumal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-02-15 · Shipp & Pham: Lifetime · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willow Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-02-02 · IA/Despotovich-Shipp/40&Over8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ravindran Perumal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-01-12 · IA/Rovner/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Marchese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-01-05 · Pham/Whipp · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Willett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-03 · IA/Rovner/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Bradfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-12-22 · IA/Rovner/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Johansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-12-15 · IA/Rovner/55&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ewa Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Teams55 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.8% of games
4.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 54.2% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
21W–6L · 59% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer