← Search

Beth Cendali

Boulder, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 30W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Cendali to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-08-06 · MEA BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · MEA BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · MEA GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susannah Sieper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-16 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emel Gomulka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · MEA ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Banich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · MEA ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Koury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-02 · MEA GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susannah Sieper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-06-25 · MEA GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · MEA ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · MEA GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gia Medeiros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-10 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirsten Roeber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-5
L
2026-05-14 · MEA PINK · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Brynestad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 49.6% of games
4.0
31.2%
10W–22L · 38.3% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova