← Search

Christine Lammers

Canton, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
249 matches · 150W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine Lammers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history249 matches
L
2026-08-11 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Bowdler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-31 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pete Bryant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Frances Carlson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Kerri-Ann Croftchik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · HV-Wang 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maribel Weitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-10 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dillon Funkhouser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Mondragon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · HV-Wang 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Bambini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Bowdler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frances Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-23 · HV-Wang 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Bambini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-17 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dee Lamphear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
73%
46W–17L · 59.1% of games
4.0
46.9%
38W–43L · 48.1% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 56% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
57 matches
#1 Singles
5%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams