← Search

Nisha Jam

Bloomfield Hills, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 136W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nisha Jam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
W
2026-08-11 · BOH-Fredericks 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Friesen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
Rebecca Friske / Leah Collie
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Luminita Varos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
Yoko Hescott / Jasmine Irish
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Stacey Mondragon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Luminita Varos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Grace Kurec Shahnazary championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Luminita Varos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Vanessa Lindow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Luminita Varos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Luminita Varos championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-24 · BOH-Fredericks 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Harry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · FAC- Jam 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luminita Varos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · TROY-Livingston 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Lindow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.4% of games
4.0
72.7%
56W–21L · 57.9% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.6% of games
7.5
84%
21W–4L · 66% of games
8.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 68.4% of games
8.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
43 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova