← Search

Kristen Patch

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 82W–63L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kristen Patch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Me.McCaskill18C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Bess Pitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-01 · Be.Pitt40C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katherine Teague
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · Be.Pitt40C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Margaret Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · Me.McCaskill18C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Bess Pitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · Sa.Highsmith40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sally Highsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · Me.McCaskill18C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Bess Pitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · Cl.Duff18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · Cl.Duff18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-30 · Sa.Highsmith40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Goodmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-28 · Cl.Duff40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Goodmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · Kr.Patch18A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith McCaskill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-23 · Sa.Highsmith40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Goodmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
69.3%
52W–23L · 59.9% of games
3.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 49.1% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 54% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 26.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#1 Singles
8%
12 matches
#3 Singles
8%
12 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams