← Search

Asa Burnham

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 16W–43L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Asa Burnham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Ma.Springfield40C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary-Kate Knox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · As.Burnham18C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Leigh Stallworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · As.Burnham18C · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cassandra Lagod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · As.Burnham18C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cassandra Lagod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Mayur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary T Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-12 · Ki.Roberts40A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-07 · Ki.Roberts40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Denise Goldstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-05 · Ki.Roberts40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy van Ness
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · TOC.Burnham · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Qubeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
23.1%
9W–30L · 35.8% of games
3.5
10%
1W–9L · 32.2% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#1 Singles
14%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams