← Search

Ken Lawton

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 96W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ken Lawton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Jo.Diamond55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ken Glanville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Daniel Knox / John VanDeWater
2026-07-28 · Da.Swann55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Nowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Larry Leins / Joseph Smith
2026-07-13 · Da.Swann55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-22 · Da.Swann55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Nowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · with Walter Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · with James Klemenz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-30 · Jo.Diamond55A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Klemenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-23 · Jo.Diamond55A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Monaghen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · Jo.Diamond40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vincent Conzola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-15 · Jo.Diamond40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vincent Conzola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-04-08 · Jo.Diamond40A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Shait
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-02 · Jo.Diamond55A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Monaghen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66.7%
66W–33L · 57% of games
7.5
50%
11W–11L · 53.1% of games
8.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.2% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
47 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova