← Search

Amanda Laird

Durham, NC
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 31W–67L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amanda Laird to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-09-08 · MMcCullough-DUR · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Annaliese Gresham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-31 · PDavis.18.5.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Caroline Sloan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · LBible-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nsimba Mahungu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · MMcCullough-DUR · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Collette Toney / Sonya Bentovich
2026-08-16 · LBible-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Santae Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · PDavis.40.5.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Liz Schaller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-13 · MMcCullough-DUR · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-10 · PDavis.40.5.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Carin von Kahr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · JYoung.40-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Russell Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · PDavis-DUR · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · PDavis-DUR · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Emily Patulski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-1
L
2026-06-24 · JYoung.40-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carl Laird mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
38.2%
13W–21L · 45% of games
3.0
24%
6W–19L · 36% of games
5.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.7% of games
5.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 49.1% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 27.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer