← Search

Caroline Sloan

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 50W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Caroline Sloan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-08-31 · PDavis.18.5.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Amanda Laird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Carol Zhang / Erin Miller
2026-08-26 · PDavis.18.5.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kellie Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · PDavis.18.5.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Annaliese Gresham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Kelly Kelly / Kelli Williams
2026-08-03 · Er.Wynia18C6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joanne Kearney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patsy Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · JRanheim-TOCH · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · PDavis-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lucy McMillan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-05 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patsy Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · JRanheim-TOCH · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-28 · JRanheim-TOCH · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · PDavis-DUR · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
14W–0L · 86.2% of games
3.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 66.9% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.5% of games
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 68.9% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#1 Singles
30%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova