← Search

Cecilia Gonzales

PITTSBORO, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 49W–90L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Cecilia Gonzales to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-09-13 · BCleveland.6.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emilie Moses
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-26 · SBartle.40C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carin von Kahr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-19 · SBartle.40C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Goll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-16 · BCleveland.6.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie DeConto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-15 · ABoone-BP · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Angela Boone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-12 · SBartle.40C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Smyth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · BCleveland.6.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ellina Max
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-02 · BCleveland.6.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie DeConto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · MBlake-TOCH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · DOrdronneau-TOCH · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · MBlake-TOCH · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · MBlake-BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 61.8% of games
3.0
35.9%
23W–41L · 43.5% of games
3.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 24.6% of games
5.5
39.4%
13W–20L · 44.8% of games
6.5
14.3%
2W–12L · 31.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#1 Singles
19%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
22 matches
#3 Singles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
8%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer