← Search

Danielle Arnsdorff

Tupelo, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 17W–13L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Danielle Arnsdorff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-08-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Bethany Bounds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bethany Bounds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · Bethany Bounds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Credille
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · Duncan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Drew Clement mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · Bethany Bounds · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lexi Chism
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-31 · Duncan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Duncan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Kelly Young 4.0 18s · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Briley Clement
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-03-22 · Kelly Young 4.0 18s · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-04-30 · Susanne Lindsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracie Grammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-04-10 · Susanne Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Briley Clement
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-07 · Susanne Lindsey · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Briley Clement
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-01 · Susanne Lindsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracie Grammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 75.6% of games
4.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.8% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
10 matches
#2 Singles
27%
8 matches
#1 Singles
23%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal