← Search

Jessica King

NEW ALBANY, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 50W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica King to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-02-15 · New Albany 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yan Omen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-16 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Ritter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-02 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yan Omen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-11-17 · New Albany · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-11-03 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Kreitzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-10-27 · New Albany · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-09-15 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nevada Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-17 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natasha Petroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-01-07 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carmela Meade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-12-10 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Lori Brown / Tammy M Jarrett
2023-11-27 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-11-20 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.2% of games
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
4.0
53.4%
31W–27L · 51.3% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 64.7% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#1 Singles
18%
16 matches
#2 Singles
18%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova