← Search

Ann Skvarcius

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 92W–28L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Ann Skvarcius to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Je.Anderson18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rose Whitehurst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · Ki.Patrey40C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jane Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · TPerrone.40C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-22 · Je.Anderson18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · LKulp.7.5C-SVC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffany Langino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-19 · Ki.Patrey40C7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Nate Wireback / Logan Adkins
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with John Hood championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · ABaxley.40.3.5-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivan Andjelkovic mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
Kelly Johnson / Kelsey Norris
2026-07-21 · MLong.4.0T.40-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celina Morice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · MLong.4.0T.40-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regina Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · La.Fye18M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jakob Lagerstedt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · ABaxley.40.3.5-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivan Andjelkovic mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
92.3%
24W–2L · 69.8% of games
3.5
83.3%
30W–6L · 68.3% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.4% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 71.8% of games
7.5
50%
5W–5L · 52.7% of games
3.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 62.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova