← Search

Abigail Hatcher

Durham, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 55W–26L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Abigail Hatcher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-09-10 · LHsu-HR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carrie Couto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-09-08 · CCouto-HR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Huebner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-03 · LHsu-HR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carrie Couto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · CCouto-HR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kay Mabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · BMcGarrah-HR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Connie Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · CCouto-HR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Huebner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-10 · BMcGarrah-HR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Sonders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-03 · BMcGarrah-HR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Sonders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · LHsu-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Nelsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · EWyngaarden-HR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Fortin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-16 · LHsu-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Lubeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-6
W
2026-07-09 · LHsu-HR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Klein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.4% of games
3.5
48%
12W–13L · 55.1% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 47.6% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 62.5% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.6% of games
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 79% of games
3.5mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
16 matches
#1 Singles
16%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams