← Search

Debbie Lipski

Lakewood, CO
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 54W–36L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Debbie Lipski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2023-09-04 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Gaudet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Jacqueline Tynes / Meg Yon
2023-08-31 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-07-24 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-29 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-25 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Skelton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
Jennifer Lewis / Jill Orsatti
2023-06-22 · NJ RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kira Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-15 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-06-04 · #3 Doubles · with Oscar Torres championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-03 · #2 Doubles · with Yah Pisutpongpan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2023-06-02 · #1 Doubles · with Oscar Torres championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2023-06-02 · #2 Doubles · with Yah Pisutpongpan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2023-06-01 · NJ MAROON · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 59.1% of games
3.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 52.2% of games
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.9% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 64% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#1 Singles
24%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer