← Search

Christopher Kager

Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 23W–16L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christopher Kager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-06-30 · Lanc CC - Shelton · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Kearon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · Lanc CC - Shelton · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Garvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · with Carol Dimm championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · RCW - Walden / Cook · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Dimm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-14 · RCW - Walden / Cook · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Hess mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · RCW - Walden / Cook · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Hess mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-12-13 · Hempfield - Stauffer / Stover · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-12 · Hempfield - Stauffer / Stover · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Deisley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-10-05 · Hempfield - Stauffer / Stover · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gretchen Walden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-15 · LCC/BCCC - Shelton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Garvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-28 · LCC/BCCC - Shelton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Travis Eby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-03-16 · RCW - Walden / Cook · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Hess mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.8% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams