← Search

Katherine Deisley

— year-end
89 matches · 40W–49L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Katherine Deisley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Hempfield - Stover / Stauffer · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stas Valldes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Hess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Lamond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-17 · Hempfield - Criswell · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Hempfield - Dimm · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Alderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · Hempfield - Criswell · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · Hempfield - Criswell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Lamond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · Hempfield - Criswell · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · Hempfield Strange Magic · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Hempfield - Criswell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Schlageter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
Teams18 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 64.3% of games
3.5
37.9%
25W–41L · 47.1% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 64.8% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
15 matches
#2 Singles
14%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova