← Search

Sharon Davis

— year-end
175 matches · 110W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sharon Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
W
2025-12-13 · Hempfield - Stauffer / Stover · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christopher Kager mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-11-23 · Hempfield - Stauffer / Stover · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victor Kong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-09 · Hempfield - Stauffer / Stover · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victor Kong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-09-28 · Hempfield - Hufnagel · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Bonnie Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-13 · Hempfield - Strange Magic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Sandhu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-08-07 · Hempfield - Strange Magic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Sandhu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-30 · Hempfield - Strange Magic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Rittase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-18 · Hempfield - Criswell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-07-09 · Hempfield - Criswell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Deisley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-07 · Hempfield - Criswell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Deisley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-21 · Hempfield - Criswell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Schlageter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-18 · Hempfield - Strange Magic · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Strange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
70.6%
48W–20L · 56.1% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.7% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King