← Search

Chad Laber

Dublin, OH
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 20W–21L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Chad Laber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2023-04-02 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Bode
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-03-12 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeremy Dominik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Scott Baker / Jason Roush
2023-02-19 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2023-02-05 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Soter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2023-01-29 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-01-22 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Konstantin Tsibouris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-11-06 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2022-10-23 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Novikoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-10-16 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-10-09 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2020-11-01 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Konstantin Tsibouris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2020-10-11 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Novikoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
75%
6W–2L · 62.3% of games
4.5
42.4%
14W–19L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#1 Singles
20%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova