← Search

Jake Weil

New Albany, OH
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 63W–41L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Jake Weil to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
John Fleming / Robert McDonald
2025-03-16 · New Albany 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Layne Dreven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-25 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Frandsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-1
W
2024-01-28 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Frandsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-05-21 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Milan Jovanovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-03-26 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Harding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Michael White / Alex Yadegari
2023-03-05 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2023-02-05 · New Albany · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Pammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2023-01-15 · Scarborough 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronald Petroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2022-12-18 · Scarborough 1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronald Petroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Matthew Johnson / Andrew Shulman
2022-12-11 · Scarborough 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronald Petroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-11-20 · Scarborough 1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronald Petroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-05-18 · New Albany · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeffrey Wilcoxon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
73.6%
53W–19L · 62.7% of games
4.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 45.4% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
20 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams