← Search

Natalie Schaberg

— year-end
44 matches · 35W–9L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Natalie Schaberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2021-06-01 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jena Dupont
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2021-05-25 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Reisbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2021-05-16 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelly Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2021-05-04 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Ham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2020-09-23 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2020-09-14 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2020-09-07 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2020-08-31 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Kiefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2020-08-24 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2020-08-18 · CACM SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2020-08-17 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2020-08-13 · CACM BLACK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams5 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 73.8% of games
3.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 64.3% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 57.4% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe