← Search

Shelly Jones

— year-end
153 matches · 106W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shelly Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
W
2026-08-25 · CACM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NATALIE KOONTZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · CACM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Vanek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · CACM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Boulanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · CACM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Boulanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · CACM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NATALIE KOONTZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NATALIE KOONTZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-09 · CACM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Cruikshank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NATALIE KOONTZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · CACM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Vanek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Vanek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · CACM BLACK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Boulanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NATALIE KOONTZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 68.3% of games
3.5
75%
12W–4L · 62.6% of games
4.0
68.9%
62W–28L · 56.3% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.4% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.3% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.1% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
22 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King