← Search

Kara McCormick

— year-end
171 matches · 99W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kara McCormick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
L
Deborah Pearson / Nicole Taylor
2026-07-19 · QRRC-Sommerfeldt · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jenifer Klump
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-2
L
2026-06-14 · QRRC-Sommerfeldt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chelsea Sommerfeldt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · KTC-Shively · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Goel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Nicole Taylor
2026-05-02 · QRRC-Denker · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · KTC-Shively · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Peyton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-21 · QRRC-Denker · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · QRRC-Denker · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-15 · KTC-Shively · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Peyton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-13 · KTC-Shively · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Goel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-01 · QRRC-Denker · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-30 · KTC-Shively · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Metzcar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · QRRC-Denker · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carlyn McCarthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 73% of games
3.5
71.7%
33W–13L · 58.7% of games
4.0
31.4%
16W–35L · 42.1% of games
6.5
60%
12W–8L · 52.8% of games
7.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 64% of games
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 58.6% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 28% of the time
#2 Singles
28%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#1 Singles
21%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams