← Search

Heidi Clark

Heber City, UT
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
116 matches · 61W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heidi Clark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Neuberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-10 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · Heber Valley Tennis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Planck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Tagge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Neuberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Labrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-05 · Wasatch Rec-Peterson/King · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-02-12 · Wasatch Rec-Peterson/King · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl A McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-29 · Wasatch Rec-Peterson/King · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-4
W
2025-12-04 · Heber Valley-Peterson/King · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
59.7%
46W–31L · 52.8% of games
4.0
38.5%
15W–24L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe