← Search

Sue Smith

— year-end
144 matches · 99W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sue Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Wooden Rackets · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Massae Sato MacIunas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · Wooden Rackets · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-10 · Wooden Rackets · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Ainge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Wooden Rackets · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Ainge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · SunPro-Fowkes/Carter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brittany Southam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · SunPro-Fowkes/Carter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-26 · SunPro-Fowkes/Carter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · Mid-Court Crisis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie Goddard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-27 · Mid-Court Crisis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Simone McInnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · SunPro-Warren/Carter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Pickard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · SunPro-Warren/Carter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-05 · SunPro-Warren/Carter · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kortney Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-4
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
12W–4L · 58.9% of games
3.5
88.9%
24W–3L · 68.5% of games
4.0
66.7%
42W–21L · 54.3% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.9% of games
8.0
50%
8W–8L · 54.6% of games
9.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert