← Search

Patsy Park

Chapel Hill, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 43W–46L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Patsy Park to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-09-06 · PDavis.40.5.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · PDavis.18.5.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Annaliese Gresham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-30 · LBible-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Santae Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · PDavis.40.5.5C-DUR · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Susan Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-09 · LBible-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Santae Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · KLaan-UNC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Haslett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-07-19 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Sloan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · CMills-UNC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-05 · PDavis-DUR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Sloan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · KLaan-UNC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Berliner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · KLaan-UNC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with LAURIE KIEFFER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-12 · CMills-UNC · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
94.7%
18W–1L · 72.7% of games
3.0
18.5%
5W–22L · 41.8% of games
3.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 38.7% of games
5.0
50%
4W–4L · 54.2% of games
5.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 62.5% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#1 Singles
14%
12 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King