← Search

Alecxis Naviaux

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 86W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alecxis Naviaux to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-08-23 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Naviaux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-18 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Reisbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Evashevski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-04 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Reisbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-02 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Naviaux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-28 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Reisbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Naviaux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · CACM BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Naviaux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · CACM PINK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Reisbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-23 · CACM PINK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kailey Dellenbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-10 · LTFC RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Naviaux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
85%
34W–6L · 67% of games
4.0
59.2%
29W–20L · 51.3% of games
6.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 69.6% of games
7.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 64.8% of games
7.5mixed
50%
9W–9L · 49.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
43 matches
#1 Singles
24%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal