← Search

Craig Friedrich

Severna Park, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 101W–51L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Craig Friedrich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Nicholson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joi Remoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · Nicholson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi Hathaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · Summer Blend · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joi Remoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-22 · Nicholson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joi Remoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · Summer Blend · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Tindall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-12 · Nicholson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chrystine Tadler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Joi Remoll championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Summer Blend · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-13 · Friedrich/Wagner · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Wagner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · Friedrich/Wagner · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-25 · Wagner · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joi Remoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 56.6% of games
4.0
73.1%
49W–18L · 58.9% of games
4.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 35% of games
7.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 64% of games
8.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 53.8% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
38 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer