← Search

Ami Young

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 39W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Ami Young to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-04-27 · KMasood-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma Gould
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-13 · KMasood-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Beall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-23 · KMasood-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Naramor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-09 · KMasood-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Beall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-29 · ROakley-EV · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-08 · ROakley-EV · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-11 · ROakley-EV · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-06-10 · ROakley-EV · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reggie Oakley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-03 · ROakley-EV · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Reggie Oakley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-02 · KTravis-EV · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-19 · KTravis-EV · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-12 · KTravis-EV · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.8% of games
3.5
48%
12W–13L · 43.8% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.9% of games
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.5% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams