← Search

Ashley Grantham

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 36W–53L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ashley Grantham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-08-02 · TOC.May · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Molly van Dyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-09 · Ki.Lamm18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Flowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Ki.Lamm18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Flowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Ki.Lamm18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Testa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-12 · As.Grantham40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Desonglo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-05 · As.Grantham40A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · As.Grantham40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Desonglo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-03-28 · NMAC.Friedman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany Friedman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-24 · As.Grantham40A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Lamm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-20 · NMAC.Friedman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-03-17 · As.Grantham40A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susie Albion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-14 · NMAC.Friedman · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
53.5%
23W–20L · 53.3% of games
3.0
31%
9W–20L · 45.2% of games
5.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.9% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#1 Singles
14%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#2 Singles
11%
10 matches
#3 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal