← Search

Amy Wilkerson

— year-end
41 matches · 29W–12L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Amy Wilkerson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2022-10-05 · McKie/Mrazek · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Rechtlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2022-09-14 · McKie/Mrazek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Rosen-McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2022-07-19 · Mrazek/McKie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Rosen-McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-5, 1-0
W
2022-06-28 · Mrazek/McKie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ritika Chand Bergfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2022-06-14 · Mrazek/McKie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ritika Chand Bergfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-2
L
2022-06-07 · Mrazek/McKie · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2022-05-31 · Mrazek/McKie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Rosen-McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2022-02-23 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susie Kinsella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Anne Ross / Maureen Burns
2022-02-09 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli McKie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2022-01-26 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susie Kinsella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3, 1-0
W
2022-01-12 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli McKie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2021-12-01 · Mrazek/McKie (FD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susie Kinsella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams6 teams · 2020–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
81%
17W–4L · 64.5% of games
3.5
60%
12W–8L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert